2002 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Paul Stevens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
The 2002 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 7, 2002 and concluded October 5, 2003. This was the twenty-eighth term of Associate Justice John Paul Stevens's tenure on the Court. John Paul Stevens, SCOTUS photo portrait.jpg
John Paul Stevens 2002 term statistics
9
Majority or Plurality
11
Concurrence
4
Other
8
Dissent
3
Concurrence/dissent Total = 35
Bench opinions = 30 Opinions relating to orders = 3 In-chambers opinions = 2
Unanimous opinions: 1 Most joined by: Souter (15) Least joined by: Scalia (4)
Type Case Citation Issues Joined by Other opinions
2-01



Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson 537 U.S. 28 (2002)

2-02



Yellow Transportation, Inc. v. Michigan 537 U.S. 36 (2002)

1-03



Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine 537 U.S. 51 (2002)

Unanimous
4-04



Abdur'Rahman v. Bell 537 U.S. 88 (2002)

Stevens dissented from the Court's dismissal of certiorari as improvidently granted.
4-05



Eldred v. Ashcroft 537 U.S. 186 (2003)

3-06



United States v. Jimenez Recio 537 U.S. 270 (2003)

2-07



FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. 537 U.S. 293 (2003)

4-08



Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc. 537 U.S. 393 (2003)

1-09



Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. 537 U.S. 418 (2003)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer; Scalia (in part)
1-10



Boeing Co. v. United State 537 U.S. 437 (2003)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
5-11



Foster v. Florida 537 U.S. 990 (2002)

Stevens filed a statement respecting the Court's denial of certiorari, to emphasize that it does not amount to a judgment on the merits.
5-12



Stewart v. McCoy 537 U.S. 993 (2002)

Stevens filed a statement respecting the Court's denial of certiorari.
4-13



In re Stanford 537 U.S. 968 (2002)

Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Stevens dissented from the Court's denial of a writ of habeas corpus.
5-14



Chabad of Southern Ohio v. Cincinnati 537 U.S. 1501 (2002)

Stevens granted the application to vacate a stay.
2-15



Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe 538 U.S. 1 (2003)

4-16



Ewing v. California 538 U.S. 11 (2003)

Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
4-17



Smith v. Doe 538 U.S. 84 (2003)

1-18



Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington 538 U.S. 216 (2003)

O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
2-19



Branch v. Smith 538 U.S. 254 (2003)

Souter, Breyer
2-20



Virginia v. Black 538 U.S. 343 (2003)

1-21



Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. Wells 538 U.S. 440 (2003)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas
1-22



Pharmaceutical Research and Mfrs. of America v. Walsh 538 U.S. 644 (2003)

Souter, Ginsburg; Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Breyer (in part)
2-23



Inyo County v. Pauite-Shoshone Indians 538 U.S. 701 (2003)

2-24



Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs 538 U.S. 721 (2003)

3-25



Chavez v. Martinez 538 U.S. 760 (2003)

2-26



National Park Hospitality Assn. v. Department of Interior 538 U.S. 803 (2003)

1-27



Beneficial National Bank v. Anderson 539 U.S. 1 (2003)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
1-28



Hillside Dairy, Inc. v. Lyons 539 U.S. 59 (2003)

Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer; Thomas (in part)
1-29



Nguyen v. United States 539 U.S. 69 (2003)

O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas
2-30



Nguyen v. United States 539 U.S. 126 (2003)

Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
4-31



United States v. American Library Association, Inc. 539 U.S. 194 (2003)

4-32



Gratz v. Bollinger 539 U.S. 244 (2003)

Souter
3-33



Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle 539 U.S. 444 (2003)

2-34



Nike, Inc. v. Klasky 539 U.S. 654 (2003)

Ginsburg; Souter (in part)
Stevens concurred in the Court's dismissal of certiorari as improvidently granted.
5-35



Prato v. Vallas 539 U.S. 1301 (2003)

Stevens denied the petitioner's request for an extension of time to pay the docketing fee and printing costs for the petition for certiorari, satisfied that there are no grounds upon which the Court would grant the petition.

References