User talk:Counteraction

Welcome!

Hello, Counteraction, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Contents 1 Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident‎ 2 Chip Berlet 3 June 2010 4 July 2010 5 "Conspiracy" 6 December 2010 7 August 2011

Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident‎

Re your edits to Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident‎. Please note that is a controversial article only recently come off protection. Admins have noted their intent to block people repeatedly upsetting the delicate balance there; you should be cautious William M. Connolley (talk) 14:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

As you can see from my response to the Talk Page posting, I agree that something along the lines of what you have suggested would be appropriate to the article. Due to the controversial nature of the matter, adding material does take some time, at least a few hours if not a day or so. As you may note, very little has been added to the article for the last two days it's been unprotected, and the vast vast majority of what has been added is non-controversial news-y sorts of stuff.

So, I am confident that something will be added, but it will take some time for a consensus to develop.

Thanks, Madman (talk) 14:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Chip Berlet

The Chip Berlet article has survived two deletion votes. It contains numerous third-party sources. Berlet is one of the few serious people researching right-wing extremist movements. What caused you to put a "notability" tag on it? Have you read the archived discussions, and has something changed? M.boli (talk) 07:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bilderberg Group, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 11:16, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to David Ray Griffin, you may be blocked from editing. It's pretty obvious you are trying to remove mention of Chip Berlet. Please stop this, as you were told, his article survived discussions on his notability. Dougweller (talk) 11:23, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on vitamin E. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

"Conspiracy"

I'm just giving you the obligatory "please stop" notice, before reporting you ... Stop going to numerous articles (e.g. Armenian Genocide and September 11 Attacks) and inserting "conspiracy", etc. unless you have reliable sources that make such a claim. -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 18:53, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Justin Bieber. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A change of the magnitude you made requires reliable sources—and multiple, well-respected ones at that. —C.Fred (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roselle Park, New Jersey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I have taken a look at your editing history, and your continued vandalism, as well as your habit of removing warnings from your user page, convince me that no further vandalism should be tolerated from you. Slashme (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dominionism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)